Dear Edward, we‘re in awe. We, being the https://tedxmuenster.de/en/about/ team in Germany, would be very honored to have you on stage at this year’s main event on the 23rd June. Please let me know if you’re interested in following up on this conversation. Thank you and warm regards, Wiebke.
I tried it using my own written essay, which was entirely written by myself and the result was that about 5% of the essay, which was around 3 sentences were highlighted as being written by AI. The conclusion gptzero gave me was: "Your text is most likely human written but there are some sentences with low perplexities."
What does this mean? Where can we get an explanation of the factors being used such as perplexity and burstiness.
What worries me is that in cases like the one I pointed out above, won't an organisation that relies on this app as an absolute measure of truth mistakenly believe I used an AI when I didn't, threatening my credibility.
The newest thing, someone posted, is that students take something written by AI and run it through a text spinner (paraphrasing software), and this makes it impossible to ID as AI. Anyone know if that is true? Can Zero do anything about that? Anyone have any suggestions about how to deal with it?
Tried it with two essays generated by ChatGPT. For both it said "Your text is likely to be written entirely by a human." So, it appears to be completely useless.
Dear Edward, we‘re in awe. We, being the https://tedxmuenster.de/en/about/ team in Germany, would be very honored to have you on stage at this year’s main event on the 23rd June. Please let me know if you’re interested in following up on this conversation. Thank you and warm regards, Wiebke.
Email me at wiebke@tedxmuenster.de :)
I tried it using my own written essay, which was entirely written by myself and the result was that about 5% of the essay, which was around 3 sentences were highlighted as being written by AI. The conclusion gptzero gave me was: "Your text is most likely human written but there are some sentences with low perplexities."
What does this mean? Where can we get an explanation of the factors being used such as perplexity and burstiness.
What worries me is that in cases like the one I pointed out above, won't an organisation that relies on this app as an absolute measure of truth mistakenly believe I used an AI when I didn't, threatening my credibility.
Thanks for the improvement.
Testing the improved version of the tool, I noticed that the tool wrongly identifies texts completely written by humans as texts written by AI.
I suggest this feature be improved
congratulations @edwardtian & team💥
we have bypassed this
https://github.com/gonzoknows/AI-Detection-Bypassers
Hi,
Where I can find pricing/usage conditions?
Can you provide a transcript of the video please? I can't hear the audio. Thank you
The slashed out "mute" icon in the corner means that there is no audio. You just watch the video demonstration and infer the usage
Congrats ! :)
Does it work in all languages ?
4214 Crescent St
Long Island City, NY 11101
The newest thing, someone posted, is that students take something written by AI and run it through a text spinner (paraphrasing software), and this makes it impossible to ID as AI. Anyone know if that is true? Can Zero do anything about that? Anyone have any suggestions about how to deal with it?
Definitely showing this to my principal to get some brownie points at work
Tried it with two essays generated by ChatGPT. For both it said "Your text is likely to be written entirely by a human." So, it appears to be completely useless.